This
summer I heard a radio news report on an EU effort to encourage more girls to
pursue studies and careers in scientific fields. The report was produced by PRI’s program The World. It is available at the link below.
I heard
this report as I was contemplating Dr. Slaughter’s article and the varied
responses it inspired.
The gist
of this EU effort to attract girls to science is that we attract girls by
showing them that female scientists are sexy and attractive to guys. The girls in the ad are highly sexualized. They
are wearing high heels and very short mini-skirts. They are wearing make-up and have spent a lot
of time on their hair.
Frankly,
the girls in the ad look to me like street-walkers. But maybe that is just my take on it. In the circles I run, I don’t see a lot of
females dressed like this. I have not
actually spent time in areas where prostitutes solicit customers on street
corners. But based on pop culture
representations, this EU ad jives with my own mental image of how such sex
workers look.
The EU
campaign was apparently inspired by an underrepresentation of women in
science. I agree that is a problem. When women are not represented in various
fields, those fields (and society as a whole) does not benefit from the insight
of their perspectives and concerns.
Traditionally,
women have been underrepresented in law.
Even today, after over a decade of gender parity in law school, women
still only account for about a third of practicing lawyers. It is no surprise that issues concerning
women (e.g., sexual assault, custody and property division to stay-at-home
spouses) have been overlooked. It is
astounding to read old cases on the law of rape when there were no women lawyers
on the bench or appearing at bar. The
law of sexual assault has evolved somewhat now that there are women involved in
the development of our laws. But it is
still far from perfect.
Women have
also been underrepresented in the ranks of doctors and medical
researchers. It should not shock anyone
that the bulk of medical research has historically been done on health
challenges of males. It has been
relatively recently that we’ve begun to focus more on female health issues like
breast and cervical cancer. But there is
still a lot more to do.
So, I do
not disagree with the goal of the EU in trying to encourage girls to go into
science.
However,
the approach of the ad is so simplistic and frankly insulting. It fails to understand why girls don’t go
into science. Personally, as a former girl
who didn’t go into science, and as a former educator of middle schoolers, I
doubt the gender divide has much if anything to do with an image of scientists
as unattractive. Moreover, I find tragic
beyond words any campaign based on girls building their self-image and
self-worth on the amount of attention they get from males.
I
personally cannot fathom what the discussions must have been when a PR firm
came up with this ad. I’m guessing that no
women were involved in the discussions.
I’m also wondering if the people in the room were smoking a substance
that impaired their judgment.
Proverbs 14:6
A mocker searches for wisdom and gets none, but knowledge comes quickly to the intelligent.
A mocker searches for wisdom and gets none, but knowledge comes quickly to the intelligent.
No comments:
Post a Comment